Menu
Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media is part of t...

NAB VICTIM

NAB VICTIM

In late 2008 we became vi...

Banking In Australia Today

Banking In Australia Today

Visit Banking in Austra...

Donate Please

Donate Please

We need your support. ...

Prev Next
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Welcome to the Kunena forum!

Tell us and our members who you are, what you like and why you became a member of this site.
We welcome all new members and hope to see you around a lot!
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: Howard Bowles 501(3) cases with Julia Gilllard

Howard Bowles 501(3) cases with Julia Gilllard 3 months 3 weeks ago #3301

  • Scrag
  • Scrag's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 2692
  • Thank you received: 9
  • Karma: 0
Marsha Blackburn knows her tax laws, and the question becomes, is Howard Bowles' Board liable if it blows the whistle on funnellers of Australian taxpayers money to a Pay to Play Scheme? www.scribd.com/document/338288165/Referr...15-Letter#from_embed
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Howard Bowles 501(3) cases with Julia Gilllard 3 months 3 weeks ago #3305

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 242
  • Thank you received: 7
  • Karma: 0
Armstrong Economics says:

Clinton Foundation Being Investigated now by IRS, FBI & Intelligence
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook1.5KShare to TwitterShare to LinkedIn13Share to Google+Share to More305
Blog/2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Posted Nov 4, 2016 by Martin Armstrong

clinton-foundation-irs

Wikileaks has also revealed that the Clinton Foundation, which is the closest thing to a Racketeering Organized Crime Family, is being investigated by the IRS. However, sources also say that the FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation is far more serious than did she have classified info on private emails.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Howard Bowles 501(3) cases with Julia Gilllard 3 months 1 week ago #3320

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 242
  • Thank you received: 7
  • Karma: 0
Slater and Gordon shares smashed to pieces - record low - continues to bleed cash
Thursday, 16 February 2017

Screen Shot 2017-02-16 at 7.49.41 am

I think Andrew Grech and his generous board might be starting to get the message.

This line from their try-to-be-upbeat announcement to the ASX explains:

Slater and Gordon's Australian business has more recently started to show signs of being impacted by negative sentiment about the business



Screen Shot 2017-02-16 at 7.30.10 amScreen Shot 2017-02-16 at 7.30.24 am

Screen Shot 2017-02-16 at 7.29.26 am
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Howard Bowles 501(3) cases with Julia Gilllard 3 months 1 week ago #3324

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 242
  • Thank you received: 7
  • Karma: 0
Michael McGarvie's wife works for Slater and Gordon and his Howard Bowles must know the trust accounting rules for funds passed through trusts for the deposit on a house. What do you think about this theory from one on the investigative reporters that Howard Bowles was 'spying on'?

ATO Commissioner asked for tax ruling on "the scheme Bernard cooked up" for GILLARD
Monday, 20 February 2017

Moments like this make it all worthwhile!

KC read our post yesterday about GILLARD and the "scheme Bernard cooked up" to provide her with a lump sum "loan".

Another of our brilliant readers and regular contributors had provided a professional tax litigator's view on the scheme/combination/conspiracy. Yesterday we published that on the website, today KC has dispatched this note to the Commissioner of Taxation.

Just magnificent work, thank you to all concerned.



Sent this off to the ATO (to whom I remit close to $900K a year). Be interesting to see what response I get.


Commissioner of Taxation

I write to seek a tax ruling relative to the apparent accepted practice of a corporation providing a loan to employees, and then, over time, forgiving the loan, as some form of incentive/bonus scheme to extend the time staff remain in the employment of the corporation.
This would appear, most easily understood in the practice of Slater & Gordon expose on

www.michaelsmithnews.com/2017/02/they-go...ly-unprosecuted.html

As a substantial employer I seek clarification from the ATO as to the clear precedent set by this established, if somewhat unusual method of remunerating staff whilst, apparently avoiding taxation obligations.

I would also seek clarification as to whether the forgiveness of this loan, over time, is also a deductable expense for the employer.

While I would understand that Slater & Gordon are a large and powerful law firm with deep connections into the body politic this country is still the land of the “fair go”. If this matter is known to the ATO, which I am aware has been brought to its attention, is the ATO turning a blind eye or at least is it determining no ATO fraud has occurred and payment arrangements, by way of a forgiven loan is not taxable income. If this is in fact the case it should be available to all businesses to offer a salary package with this type of tax free incentive included.

Yours Faithfully
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Howard Bowles 501(3) cases with Julia Gilllard 2 months 3 weeks ago #3334

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 242
  • Thank you received: 7
  • Karma: 0
There are some interesting times indeed ahead for Julia Gillard and her cronies in crime. Ralph Blewitt has penned a letter to police offering to open up and tell all, even if it has consequences for him. Gillard may not be flying high with the United Nations for much longer.
Over the weekend Ralph Blewitt submitted this notice to Western Australia Police.
*****************************************************************************
Police will have their own view about what charges should flow from their investigations - but Ralph's position which he makes so clearly in this letter will have to be taken into account.
Put yourself in Ralph's shoes. He faces an uncertain future. He is under no compulsion to return to Australia, he's voluntarily making himself available to police.
Ralph knows full well that his destiny is in the hands of authorities. It must have been very, very tempting to drop the whole AWU matter and just get on with his very full life. But he hasn't done that. And I admire him for his guts and sense of right and wrong.

Dear Detective Sergeant (Name withheld),
I have recently become insulin dependent in the management of chronic Diabetes Type 2.
My wife and carer Ruby and I are adjusting to managing daily insulin injections and I have to be a little more prudent in managing my movements with a lot more pre-planning.
May I ask a few questions about my attendance at your offices “to deal with the matter”?
Will I be under arrest?
Will I be under caution?
Do police anticipate charging me with any offence(s)?
If so what offences?
If so will I be bailed, remanded or summonsed to appear in court?
Will I be permitted to leave Australia and return to my home in Malaysia after the meeting with you “to deal with the matter”? (my wife and carer Ruby does not yet have a long term visa to remain in Australia).

Background
Since late 2012 I have been available to and actively assisting police in their enquiries about the secret commissions paid by Thiess executives through the AWU Workplace Reform Association and the associated frauds, forgeries and other offences that I observed and was a part of from 1991 to 1995.
I want to tell all that I know - and I wish to co-operate with police and the courts by pleading guilty to the offences I know I helped others commit.
I am, however, not willing to cooperate in the furtherance and coverup of the offences of my co-offenders, particularly Julia GILLARD and Bruce WILSON.
I did not set out to commit any offence of my own volition.
I will not plead guilty to charges singling me out to take the fall on behalf of others. I was part of a criminal conspiracy. I didn't have the ability to do what I did without direction of others.
Every time I offended during the 1991 to 1995 course of conduct I did so at the behest (as Ms GILLARD put it during her exit interview from Slater and Gordon) of Bruce WILSON and/or Julia GILLARD.
Where I completed the application to incorporate the AWU Workplace Reform Association, so did GILLARD.
I wrote what GILLARD and WILSON told me to write.
It would be unjust and wrong just to charge GILLARD and not to charge me.
These were offences in which we were jointly involved. The same applies in reverse - it would be dishonest and unjust to charge me but not to charge my co-offenders WILSON and GILLARD as we were acting together.
When I signed the false document, Specific Power of Attorney I knew that GILLARD was not in the room to witness it. I knew the document was not signed on 4 February 1992 as it falsely states. I knew I was creating a false document and I admit to that offence. However I did not act alone and I am concerned that the courts and the public would get the wrong impression about the criminal behaviour involved in making that false document if GILLARD and WILSON are not charged with me.
When I conspired with WILSON and GILLARD to buy the Kerr Street property I wrote out a cheque for about $67,000 from the AWU Workplace Reform Association cheque book. The entry in the Slater and Gordon Trust Account ledger says the money came from me, not the association. That is false. I know that Bill Ludwig’s lawyer Con Sciacca sent a fax to GILLARD’s law firm on the day I paid the money in. The contents of that fax can only have been in the furtherance of fraud and I will consider it a neglect of police duty if that fax is not seized and produced for me to consider - as it is apparently central in the efforts to fraudulently represent that the $67,000 came from me and not the Association GILLARD, WILSON and I fraudulently set up.
Detective Sergeant, I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. There is a very important proviso in that statement - that it is the whole truth.
I didn’t set out to create the AWU Workplace Reform Association. I wouldn’t have a clue where to start. I did not brief any lawyer to act for me or to give me legal advice about incorporating the association. GILLARD was not acting as my lawyer, she was in on the conspiracy.
I look forward to meeting with you to tell all and “to deal with the matter” in its entirety once and for all.

Regards Ralph Blewitt.
**************************************************************************
Gillard and Wilson may have managed to cover their tracks so far, but I personally feel the truth is about to be told, and their run is about to come to an abrupt end.
The money Gillard has been gifting to the “Clinton Foundation” may never be recovered (Nearly half a billion dollars). The damage she has done to Australia during her governance is also irreversible in the short term.
It is now Australia needs to turn to honest government willing to govern for the people, not their own rotten vested interests!

www.michaelsmithnews.com/…/ralph-blewitt-to-plead-gu…DesiredUserName wrote:
Michael McGarvie's wife works for Slater and Gordon and his Howard Bowles must know the trust accounting rules for funds passed through trusts for the deposit on a house. What do you think about this theory from one on the investigative reporters that Howard Bowles was 'spying on'?

ATO Commissioner asked for tax ruling on "the scheme Bernard cooked up" for GILLARD
Monday, 20 February 2017

Moments like this make it all worthwhile!

KC read our post yesterday about GILLARD and the "scheme Bernard cooked up" to provide her with a lump sum "loan".

Another of our brilliant readers and regular contributors had provided a professional tax litigator's view on the scheme/combination/conspiracy. Yesterday we published that on the website, today KC has dispatched this note to the Commissioner of Taxation.

Just magnificent work, thank you to all concerned.



Sent this off to the ATO (to whom I remit close to $900K a year). Be interesting to see what response I get.


Commissioner of Taxation

I write to seek a tax ruling relative to the apparent accepted practice of a corporation providing a loan to employees, and then, over time, forgiving the loan, as some form of incentive/bonus scheme to extend the time staff remain in the employment of the corporation.
This would appear, most easily understood in the practice of Slater & Gordon expose on

www.michaelsmithnews.com/2017/02/they-go...ly-unprosecuted.html

As a substantial employer I seek clarification from the ATO as to the clear precedent set by this established, if somewhat unusual method of remunerating staff whilst, apparently avoiding taxation obligations.

I would also seek clarification as to whether the forgiveness of this loan, over time, is also a deductable expense for the employer.

While I would understand that Slater & Gordon are a large and powerful law firm with deep connections into the body politic this country is still the land of the “fair go”. If this matter is known to the ATO, which I am aware has been brought to its attention, is the ATO turning a blind eye or at least is it determining no ATO fraud has occurred and payment arrangements, by way of a forgiven loan is not taxable income. If this is in fact the case it should be available to all businesses to offer a salary package with this type of tax free incentive included.

Yours Faithfully
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Howard Bowles, Julia Gilllard and The Clintons 2 months 2 weeks ago #3336

  • Scrag
  • Scrag's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 2692
  • Thank you received: 9
  • Karma: 0
The chinese think they've got the goods on people , says Malaysian reporter Mr Kumar
www.malaysiaoutlook.com/corruption-in-au...-casinos-and-judges/
Corruption in Australia, beyond casinos and judges
By Gopal Raj Kumar
|Mar 7, 2017
Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter

Australia Foreign Minister Julie Bishop.

Attempts by Julie Bishop, Australia’s foreign minister, to besmirch the reputation of Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, has hit another obstacle with the arrest of Australia’s Crown Casino executives in China last October.

James Packer a ‘good friend’ of Julie Bishop a private guest of the Packers on a number of occasions is said by sources close to the Chinese authorities to also be a source of interest to China inspite of her position as the foreign minister of Australia.

The Chinese arrested, amongst others, Malaysian born Alfread Gomez, a Crown executive, is known to remain behind bars being interrogated in China on the offences of procuring clients for gambling in Macau and aiding in the commission of illegal activities including gambling (which is illegal in China) and money laundering.

Gomez and his fellow Crown executives currently in detention, in the interests of self preservation are said by friends in Malaysia to have sung like canaries in detention.

A couple of the detainees in last year’s raid in China are known to have been “released on bail” a method the Chinese often use to track down associates that have escaped their dragnet the first time round.

It is widely believed that some of Crown’s board including a former government minister under the Howard government is also, according to sources close to the Chinese government, on the radar of Chinese authorities and being closely monitored by them.

The former Howard government minister and other members of Crown’s board are said to have been compromised by Chinese agents some time before the raids.

The Chinese are believed to have built up large personal dossiers on each of the Australian government officials who have worked with or assisted others in their breaches of Chinese anti-gambling and anti money laundering laws.

A source close to Gomez’s family has also confirmed that high level corruption in Australia involving the gaming industry as a trap and conduit extends to Australian judges, diplomats, the police forces, individual politicians and by association both major political parties of Australia.

A Malaysian official who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the statement by Julie Bishop last August about her concerns about corruption allegations against the Malaysian government and its prime minister were not responded to by Putrajaya because officials in Putrajaya knew much more about the illicit activities of Australian government and many of its top officials than what people like Julie Bishop claimed to know about the Malaysians.

And the advice to officials in Puterajaya was not to respond or to say anything publicly about Julie Bishop or anyone else pointing fingers at Malaysia.

Operation Fox Hunt, the Xie Jin Peng government’s worldwide drag net to entrap and return to the mainland corrupt officials assisted by the likes of Crown Casino and its political connections in Australia is said to be paying significant dividends to the Chinese government.

Additionally it is also said that the connection between big business and Australian politicians is something Chinese intelligence have known about for some time.

Chinese money laundering is widespread in Australia according to the source.

Most money laundering in Australia is conducted through the purchase of real estate at highly inflated prices with the assistance of Australian government agencies who often turn the other way and Australian banks who facilitate the conveyance of large sums of money illegally siphoned out of China using fake invoices, banking and financial instruments often aided indirectly by Australian government agencies.

The threat of the death penalty if found guilty on return to China is an excuse that Australia has used effectively to provide refuge from the law for Chinese citizens suspected of laundering large sums of money taken out of Chinese government institutions illegally by corrupt Chinese officials.

Australian law prohibits Australia’s government agencies returning anyone regardless of their crime to a capital punishment jurisdiction.

An ABC Four Corners programme which was aired in Australian on the night of 6 March 2017 has identified part of a very large problem which has undermined the credibility of the Australian government, the integrity of its immigration and financial system.

It possibly has also raised concerns about high level corruption in Australian government from its close association to the large corporate sector much of it never reported widely within Australia.

Malaysian police sources have identified a number of triad syndicates running junkets that have successfully targeted high profile lawyers, judges and politicians in Queensland, Victoria, New South Wales on whom they rely favours for.

The stench of corruption in judges and politicians has heated up in recent months with revelations by notorious Russian hacker Alexei Kuznetsov who hacked into the personal and private emails and phones of Queensland judges, politicians, lawyers and businessmen threatening to drip feed of the information through the dark web and social media.

As the heat on corruption in Australia is turned up, no one it seems is game enough to explain why and under what authority the Australian governments of the Gillard, Rudd and Abbott era over the past decade donated between US$88,000,000 to $340,000,000 to Hillary Clinton’s Global Initiative (CGI).

The CGI it has been reported was a private foundation and a pay to play scheme run by the Clintons to fund Hillary Clinton’s failed tilt at the US presidency.

Email inquiries and requests for more information to government agencies and members of parliament in Australia has been met by a stony silence from both sides of parliament.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.419 seconds

News

Major Topics

Helpful Resources

Socialize

About Us