Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media is part of t...



In late 2008 we became vi...

Banking In Australia Today

Banking In Australia Today

Visit Banking in Austra...

Donate Please

Donate Please

We need your support. ...

Prev Next
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Welcome to the Kunena forum!

Tell us and our members who you are, what you like and why you became a member of this site.
We welcome all new members and hope to see you around a lot!

TOPIC: Trump tackles international pedo trafficking rings

Trump tackles international pedo trafficking rings 1 year 1 month ago #3333

  • Scrag
  • Scrag's Avatar
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 2695
  • Thank you received: 9
  • Karma: 0
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
February 09, 2017
Presidential Executive Order on Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking


- - - - - - -


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. Transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including transnational drug cartels, have spread throughout the Nation, threatening the safety of the United States and its citizens. These organizations derive revenue through widespread illegal conduct, including acts of violence and abuse that exhibit a wanton disregard for human life. They, for example, have been known to commit brutal murders, rapes, and other barbaric acts.

These groups are drivers of crime, corruption, violence, and misery. In particular, the trafficking by cartels of controlled substances has triggered a resurgence in deadly drug abuse and a corresponding rise in violent crime related to drugs. Likewise, the trafficking and smuggling of human beings by transnational criminal groups risks creating a humanitarian crisis. These crimes, along with many others, are enriching and empowering these organizations to the detriment of the American people.

A comprehensive and decisive approach is required to dismantle these organized crime syndicates and restore safety for the American people.

Sec. 2. Policy. It shall be the policy of the executive branch to:

(a) strengthen enforcement of Federal law in order to thwart transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including criminal gangs, cartels, racketeering organizations, and other groups engaged in illicit activities that present a threat to public safety and national security and that are related to, for example:

(i) the illegal smuggling and trafficking of humans, drugs or other substances, wildlife, and weapons;

(ii) corruption, cybercrime, fraud, financial crimes, and intellectual-property theft; or

(iii) the illegal concealment or transfer of proceeds derived from such illicit activities.

(b) ensure that Federal law enforcement agencies give a high priority and devote sufficient resources to efforts to identify, interdict, disrupt, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including through the investigation, apprehension, and prosecution of members of such organizations, the extradition of members of such organizations to face justice in the United States and, where appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, the swift removal from the United States of foreign nationals who are members of such organizations;

(c) maximize the extent to which all Federal agencies share information and coordinate with Federal law enforcement agencies, as permitted by law, in order to identify, interdict, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;

(d) enhance cooperation with foreign counterparts against transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including, where appropriate and permitted by law, through sharing of intelligence and law enforcement information and through increased security sector assistance to foreign partners by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security;

(e) develop strategies, under the guidance of the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, to maximize coordination among agencies -- such as through the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), Special Operations Division, the OCDETF Fusion Center, and the International Organized Crime Intelligence and Operations Center -- to counter the crimes described in subsection (a) of this section, consistent with applicable Federal law; and

(f) pursue and support additional efforts to prevent the operational success of transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations within and beyond the United States, to include prosecution of ancillary criminal offenses, such as immigration fraud and visa fraud, and the seizure of the implements of such organizations and forfeiture of the proceeds of their criminal activity.

Sec. 3. Implementation. In furtherance of the policy set forth in section 2 of this order, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, or their designees, shall co-chair and direct the existing interagency Threat Mitigation Working Group (TMWG), which shall:

(a) work to support and improve the coordination of Federal agencies' efforts to identify, interdict, investigate, prosecute, and dismantle transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations within and beyond the United States;

(b) work to improve Federal agencies' provision, collection, reporting, and sharing of, and access to, data relevant to Federal efforts against transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;

(c) work to increase intelligence and law enforcement information sharing with foreign partners battling transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, and to enhance international operational capabilities and cooperation;

(d) assess Federal agencies' allocation of monetary and personnel resources for identifying, interdicting, and dismantling transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, as well as any resources that should be redirected toward these efforts;

(e) identify Federal agencies' practices, any absence of practices, and funding needs that might hinder Federal efforts to effectively combat transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;

(f) review relevant Federal laws to determine existing ways in which to identify, interdict, and disrupt the activity of transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, and ascertain which statutory authorities, including provisions under the Immigration and Nationality Act, could be better enforced or amended to prevent foreign members of these organizations or their associates from obtaining entry into the United States and from exploiting the United States immigration system;

(g) in the interest of transparency and public safety, and in compliance with all applicable law, including the Privacy Act, issue reports at least once per quarter detailing convictions in the United States relating to transnational criminal organizations and their subsidiaries;

(h) to the extent deemed useful by the Co-Chairs, and in their discretion, identify methods for Federal agencies to coordinate, as permitted by law, with State, tribal, and local governments and law enforcement agencies, foreign law enforcement partners, public-health organizations, and non-governmental organizations in order to aid in the identification, interdiction, and dismantling of transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations;

(i) to the extent deemed useful by the Co-Chairs, and in their discretion, consult with the Office of National Drug Control Policy in implementing this order; and

(j) within 120 days of the date of this order, submit to the President a report on transnational criminal organizations and subsidiary organizations, including the extent of penetration of such organizations into the United States, and issue additional reports annually thereafter to describe the progress made in combating these criminal organizations, along with any recommended actions for dismantling them.

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


February 9, 2017
Trump vows to fight 'epidemic' of human trafficking

By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Feb 23, 2017, 2:59 PM ET

Donald Trump, Ivanka TrumpThe Associated Press
WatchInvestigating the Dark Underworld of Sex Trafficking in Holland


President Donald Trump says he will bring the "full force and weight" of the U.S. government to combat an "epidemic" of human trafficking.

The president is meeting at the White House with senior advisers and representatives of organizations that deal with trafficking. His daughter, Ivanka Trump, is among those in attendance.

Trump calls human trafficking a problem that is "not talked about enough." He says he will order the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to take a hard look at the resources they are devoting to addressing the issue.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Trump tackles international pedo trafficking rings 1 year 2 weeks ago #3341

  • Scrag
  • Scrag's Avatar
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 2695
  • Thank you received: 9
  • Karma: 0
Mcgarvie would know racketeering - he went to Harvard's course for this in 2015, that covers drug trafficking and Financial Crimes. Besides, his staff blew the whistle on his plan to find out how much the SEC and FBI knew from the SEC's informants' accountants Dennis Sgargetta and Associates. They reckon they were lent on because Mcgarvie's office knew the FBI was onto criminals that get information from McGarvie's board and commission.

Harvard Kennedy School Account Login
Search Terms

HKS Advantage
Participant Mix
By Date
By Name
By Portfolio
Program Finder
National Security Fellows
Campus Life
Contact Info
Fees & Payment Cancellations
How to Apply
Request Brochure
Benefits & Resources
Alumni Spotlight
Useful Links
Alumni FAQs
Application Process
Fees, Payments, and Cancellations

Program Information
Who Should Apply
More Info

You’re Here to Make a Difference

Skip Navigation Links

Strategic Management of Regulatory and Enforcement Agencies

Program Session(s):
October 1, 2017 - October 6, 2017
March 18, 2018 - March 23, 2018

Application Deadline(s):
August 1, 2017
January 18, 2018

Program Fee:$8,500

Program fee includes: tuition, housing, curricular materials, and most meals.

Click here to see this program’s Executive Core Qualification (ECQ) alignment.

Faculty Chair: Malcolm Sparrow

Program Director: Sergei Konoplyov

Request Brochure Apply


The Strategic Management of Regulatory and Enforcement Agencies (SMREA) program curriculum combines lectures, small group discussions, and case studies to create a stimulating and intellectually rigorous experience. During the five-day course, participants will analyze and discuss cases that encompass multiple regulatory and enforcement fields, including strategic management, the role of enforcement, emerging compliance strategies, organizational structure, performance management, and information and analytic support. The case studies span a variety of regulatory and enforcement domains, ranging from the environment to public health to crime, and are chosen on the basis of their ability to provoke, illuminate, and define the scope of best practices and new approaches.

A central component involves the participants’ reflection upon their own professional experiences and their presentation of specific examples from their work environments in both small groups and plenary sessions.

Topics to be explored include:

What are the appropriate applications and limitations of applying the customer service model to regulatory agencies?
Can agency performance be measured in terms of effects or impacts?
What role should enforcement outputs and compliance rates play in performance reporting?
How can agencies leverage innovative compliance-oriented tools without being perceived as going “soft” on violators?
How can partnerships be structured to avoid compromising the enforcement deterrent?
What constraints should be imposed on the use of self-audit privileges, amnesties, and immunity from inspection of prosecution?
Given imperfect information, how can agencies learn to assess risks and set priorities among competing risks?
How should agencies understand and manage the relationships among preventive, proactive, and reactive work?
What types of budgetary support, analytic support, and authorization are required to support effective risk-control, problem-solving, or compliance-management operations?

Please view a sample schedule.

Cases used in past sessions of the SMREA program include:

Regulatory Reform at OSHA

The federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration, created by Congress in 1970 to curtail what was viewed as a still-alarming level of industrial accidents, had, 20 years later, become a lightning rod for controversy. Its advocates viewed it as a bulwark of the defense of sale working conditions but opponents portrayed it as abusively intrusive, creating bureaucratic nightmares for employers. With that backdrop -- and with dwindling manpower and other resources -- OSHA officials in Maine, in 1991, try a radically different approach to their task, targeting 200 businesses which data has told them are the state's most important to bring into compliance. OSHA hopes both to avoid diluting the inspection capacity it has -- and to find ways to persuade, rather than to coerce through the law, business to make improvements. The apparent success of the Maine 200 program comes at a time when the new Clinton Administration is eager to find such government "reinvention" programs it can widely replicate. This case allows, first, for analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the Maine 200 effort as an example of gaining compliance through a new form of enforcement, and, second, for discussion of the complications, and advisability, of taking a small program "to scale."

On the Kindness of Strangers: The Origins and Early Days of FINCEN

When the Bush administration considers ways in which to make good on its pledge to win the war against drugs, it turns to a new type of law enforcement agency. The Financial Crime Enforcement Network, a division of the Treasury Department created in early 1990, is designed to use information from a wide variety of government agencies to follow the money-laundering trail left by drug kingpins. But an agency which must depend for its lifeblood on information in the files of other agencies faces a daunting challenge. Even the anti-drug mission is no guarantee of cooperation. This case examines the incentives and disincentives for federal inter-agency cooperation.

Dealing with Corruption in the Police Force of La Paz

A reform mayor of Bolivia's capital city is taken aback by a consultant's report showing a shocking level of corruption on the part of municipal police-a force whose many duties involve regulation of the city's sprawling open-air markets. Licenses, health inspections and many other forms of public permits are routinely exchanged for money, goods, even sex. What's more, the report concludes that the vast majority of the police could not do their job even if they set out to do so: most are illiterate. In this political management/ethics case, the Harvard-educated mayor must decide both whether and how to attempt to reform this system, at a time when he is facing re-election and is widely viewed as a "technocrat."

Recent Faculty News and Publications

Malcolm Sparrow, faculty chair of Strategic Management for Regulatory and Enforcement Agencies, was named by the White House to the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel. Visit the Harvard Kennedy School website for more details.

Malcolm Sparrow was quoted in a Bloomberg Businessweek article in regard to Medicare fraud.

Malcolm Sparrow was featured in an article addressing the Medicare fraud 'epidemic' on MSNBC.

Malcolm Sparrow was interviewed for The Nation in regard to Medicare fraud.

Apply Now : Download Brochure
You May Also Consider
Image: 84x117

Senior Managers in Government

Designed for senior government officials and their counterparts in international government, the military, and the private sector. Focuses on policy development and performance management. Click for Details.

Image: 84x117

Senior Executive Fellows

Designed to help promising senior officials prepare for promotion to Senior Executive Service. Focuses on OPM’s Executive Core Qualifications. Click for Details.

Image: 84x117

Creating Collaborative Solutions

Designed to help senior officials think about new ways of working together across traditional political and organizational boundaries in order to solve complex public problems. Click for Details.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Time to create page: 0.711 seconds


Major Topics

Helpful Resources


About Us