Menu
Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media is part of t...

NAB VICTIM

NAB VICTIM

In late 2008 we became vi...

Banking In Australia Today

Banking In Australia Today

Visit Banking in Austra...

Donate Please

Donate Please

We need your support. ...

Prev Next
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Welcome to the Kunena forum!

Tell us and our members who you are, what you like and why you became a member of this site.
We welcome all new members and hope to see you around a lot!
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: Howard Bowles' case with Matthew Stirling

USA's Organized Crime Task Force arrests 1 month 2 weeks ago #4031

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 942
  • Thank you received: 8
  • Karma: 0
More on the case that Howard Bowles claims he discussed with a landlord who was evicted called Jones (except Jones wasn't evicted). www.cnbc.com/2018/07/30/kroger-californi...mid-fee-dispute.html. Is the Legal Services Board liable for talking about cases before anyone knew - other than the Grand Jury, Prosecution Witnesses and Covert Agents and the DEA and IRS and Organized Crime Task Force .... and criminals represented by the QC in Melbourne Australia?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Ravelo in Howard Bowles' American Express Case 3 weeks 6 days ago #4056

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 942
  • Thank you received: 8
  • Karma: 0
This is the Mastercard and Visa side of the Trainwreck that Elliot Sgargetta said cost American Express billions. The trainwreck came from the arrests by the US' Organized Crime Drug Ebforcement Task Force arrests of Michelle Obama's ex workpal Keila Ravelo. Howard Bowles claims he spoke to a landlord called Glenn Jones about it when Jones said he was evicted. Are landlords evicted in Australia?

money.cnn.com/2018/09/18/news/companies/...ettlement/index.html

Visa and MasterCard, along with some top US banks, have agreed to pay as much as $6.2 billion in a class action settlement with US retailers over swipe fees.


The settlement ends a 13-year old suit brought by the nation's leading merchants, which claimed that Visa and MasterCard violated antitrust laws by fixing prices to benefit the banks. It's the largest antitrust settlement ever.
Content by MyFinance

Two Banks That Pay 10 Times The Interest On Your Savings
Two Banks That Pay 10 Times The Interest On Your Savings
An Insane Card Offering 0% APR Until October 2019
An Insane Card Offering 0% APR Until October 2019
Online Savings Account Rates Beat Your Banks
Online Savings Account Rates Beat Your Banks

Powered by

The suit has been settled before, but the original settlement reached in 2012 was rejected by major merchants as unfair and overturned on appeal. Opponents of the earlier agreement argued it would have limited the retailers' ability to bring future lawsuits and done little to end uncompetitive practices.

The amended settlement represents a $900 million increase over the previous one. The new settlement was disclosed in corporate filings by Visa (V) and MasterCard (MA) early Tuesday. It must still be approved by the court.

Under the new deal, Visa will pay an additional $600 million, while MasterCard will pay an additional $108 million, according to the companies' filings.

MasterCard and Visa said it was an important step to finally reach an agreement with merchants in this case.

"We can put this behind us and focus on continuing to innovate with our merchant partners to deliver the experience and convenience that consumers expect," said Tim Murphy, general counsel for Mastercard.

"After years of thoughtful negotiation, we are pleased to be able to reach this agreement and move forward in our partnership with merchants to provide consumers convenient, reliable, secure ways to pay," said Kelly Mahon Tullier, Visa's general counsel.

But many of the largest merchants in the nation, including Walmart (WMT), Target (TGT) and Kroger (KR), have already opted out of this settlement said Patrick Coughlin, one of the lawyers who brought the case.

Major retailers have the clout to negotiate better deals with Visa and MasterCard than are available to the typical retailer, he said.

"The top 1% of the merchants make up 25% of the nation's commerce," he said. "They were never going to be part of the deal. But this is important for the other 99% who handle the other 75% of purchases."

He said the new settlement is better than the rejected 2012 decision because larger merchants can now drop out without negating the deal for the smaller retailers.

And he said it also will bring more money for those smaller retailers, even though the amount paid by Visa, MasterCard and the banks will be partly reduced by the major retailers pulling out.

"At a minimum, we got them an additional $200 million," he said.
CNNMoney (New York) First published September 18, 2018: 10:07 AM ET
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.384 seconds

News

Major Topics

Helpful Resources

Socialize

About Us