Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media

Cuzz Media is part of t...



In late 2008 we became vi...

Banking In Australia Today

Banking In Australia Today

Visit Banking in Austra...

Donate Please

Donate Please

We need your support. ...

Prev Next
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Welcome to the Kunena forum!

Tell us and our members who you are, what you like and why you became a member of this site.
We welcome all new members and hope to see you around a lot!

TOPIC: Gagging clauses aid and abet crime: UK MPs

Gagging clauses aid and abet crime: UK MPs 9 months 1 week ago #4139

  • DesiredUserName
  • DesiredUserName's Avatar
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 1251
  • Thank you received: 11
  • Karma: 0

MPs say that individuals with a grievance against banks have been blocked from reporting concerns by oppressive legal agreements.

Solicitors are helping banks to conceal potential criminal activity through onerous gagging clauses, a parliamentary debate has heard. MPs told a Westminster Hall debate last week that individuals with a grievance against banks have been blocked from reporting concerns to regulators or the police by oppressive legal agreements.

The debate heard claims that banks have broken up businesses and destroyed livelihoods by acts of deliberate deception and fraud, systematic asset stripping and inflated charges and fees.

Attention then turned to lawyers’ involvement when

MPs discussed why so little has been done to curb or punish such behaviour.

Conservative Stephen Kerr said: ‘We need to turn to the solicitors who are, quite frankly, aiding and abetting concealment of potential criminal activity by writing contracts that contain such onerous gagging clauses.

‘In essence, they are bullying victims into silence and preventing them from discussing their case with those who are there to protect them.’

He added that the Solicitors Regulation Authority should issue ‘very firm guidance’ to prevent solicitors from contractually silencing allegations of criminal conduct.

William Wragg, also a Conservative, said lawyers had been complicit in a ‘witch hunt to silence whistleblowers’ trying to expose misconduct by the banks.

He noted that one bank sent a ‘top partner from one of the country’s best regarded law firms’ to a hearing in Cambridge County Court, for a case involving two people who had highlighted misconduct.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Time to create page: 0.183 seconds


Major Topics

Helpful Resources


About Us